On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:52 AM, Raimo Niskanen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have also found patches (#3, #4 and #7) by Philip Guenther in
> the archives of this list from May 4.
>
> Can anyone enlighten me about if these/which patches still
> are useful or if there are fresher ones or if the
> 4.4 release kernel or the -current kernel already
> contains some of them...

Ooog, the May 4th ones are a bit out of date.  Several of them have
been merged, others revised.  I posted a revised version of the thread
signal handling patch on Sep 17th.  I have some stuff beyond that, but
I need to merge the feedback I've already received and do some more
testing before I send it out anywhere.


> Or even better, what is the preferred way to test
> rthreads for an application? I will build the application
> from source and will happily patch the build?

As Ted observed, there's no need to rebuild.  I do most my testing via
LD_LIBRARY_PATH.  I.e., in $HOME/lib I have a copy of librthread.so
under the name libpthread.so.11.0, so if I start a program with
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$HOME/lib in its environment, then it uses rthreads
instead of user-level threads.  That works as long as the program (a)
isn't setuid, and (b) doesn't itself mishandle LD_LIBRARY_PATH.


Philip Guenther

Reply via email to