On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:13:30AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: | On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:40:37PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: | > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Pete Vickers<p...@systemnet.no> wrote: | > > nah, you maybe right technically with the data-center argument, but not | > > politically. Everyone has the 'right' to proper redundancy for H/A if they | > > want/need it. Actually, the sooner the IPv4 space gets used up the better, | > > then everyone will have to migrate to IPvShit, and be done with it. | > | > oh really? people are going to start carrying /48s in a world where | > they don't even carry anything more than a /24 for ipv4? | > | | One /48? It is more like one /48 per upstream provider and then you have a | total mess with the addressing. Until now it is still impossible to get PI | space in IPv6 and without it IPv6 will not fly and with it the routing | tables gonna explode.
In Europe, you can get IPv6 PI space. Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations (version 5.0) for was accepted in april 2009. See: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-01.html We'll have to see what happens to global routing tables. Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd -- >++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+ +++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-] http://www.weirdnet.nl/
