On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:24:16AM -0400, Chris Dukes wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:28:40AM +0300, Dexter Tomisson wrote:
> > http://www.trollaxor.com/2010/06/why-i-left-openbsd.html
> 
> IHBT...
> 
> There are those that use OpenBSD for every bit of their computing
> experience.  I do not even attempt to understand them.

Why?  I use OpenBSD exclusively and it works fine.  Sure there are some
programs that suck balls but don't blame that on OpenBSD blame that on
the people who write that shit.

The open source world is littered with crap and there are some gems.
Tis' the nature of the beast.

> Then there are those, like myself, that use OpenBSD for a few
> specific tasks because doing it on OpenBSD is significantly less
> painful than doing it on anything else.

So that would be, like, almost everything.  Sure if you need garbage like
youtube you might need some winders and other flash running poop.

> So, OpenBSD doesn't support your new shiny hardware.
> If you'd used your old hardware to read the device manpages you could
> have picked out hardware appropriate for the task at hand.

Right, so where is the problem again?

You either spend the time picking your hardware or chasing howtos on how
to run some random piece of shit hardware in
loonocks/fleabsd/othernoncommercialos.

These are all perception problems not real problems.  Again, if one
doesn't "need" flash one can do anything and everything on OpenBSD just
fine.  I am not claiming that OpenBSD should be used under all
circumstances however making blanket statements that OpenBSD can't
handle it is dumb.

Reply via email to