* Martin Schrvder <mar...@oneiros.de> [2011-02-02 18:35]: > 2011/2/2 Henning Brauer <lists-open...@bsws.de>: > > who sez that your made up isp has to hand out network-wide unique IPs > > to his customers? > AFAIK Comcast already has >2^24 customers. > Any major chinese or indian ISP has or will have >2^24 customers. > Heck, even DTAG will probably have >2^24 devices in their network soon.
so? > NAT is a band-aid. ah right, I forgot that you get to decide that. > So Comcast has to apply more band-aids under their band-aid? > Can you even imagine the problems a potential chinese ISP with say > 2^28 devices will have with v4? > Do you think this is sane? at least 2^24 times saner than ipvshit. > PS: I'm NOT claiming that v6 is the perfect answer. it's not an answer at all. i'm outta here, have fun playing with vshit in your sandbox. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
