* Joakim Aronius (joa...@aronius.com) wrote: > > ..dont want to fuel a flame war here but i heard stuff like AT&T is using 40 > instances of 10/8 indicates that big operators needs to bend themselves > backwards to get their stuff together.
Need to correct myself there, should be Verizon Wireless, not AT&T. https://sites.google.com/site/ipv6implementors/2010/agenda/14_Parker_VerizonWireless.pdf?attredirects=0 https://sites.google.com/site/ipv6implementors/2010/agenda Cheers, /Joakim
