On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, E.Chalaron wrote:
> Once my progressive frames are converted in DV (which hopefully will not last
> long), then they are considered interlaced, but are they really ? They may
In a sense they could be considered interlaced - just no motion
between the fields. It might be best though to tag the stream as
progressive.
> well be but the fields are not like a video, therefore I am not sure of what
> is happening using a deinterlacer for yuvmotionfps or the stabilizer ...
You don't need to use a deinterlacer - all that needs to be done is
change the YUV4MPEG2 tag to be "progressive" (Ip) since it really is
a set of progressive frames.
I thought you had altered the workflow to avoid going thru the
encode to DV and the later decoding of DV. Or is that in the
planning stages?
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
