Hi jan,
maybe my routing profile for OFM bike is different?
Not sure what Minko recommends today. Mine says "Faster Time", Standard
Elevation Mode, only road type avoidance is for "Roll Roads".
When I remove the toll roads avoidance the route is different and follows the
major road.
Gerd
________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von jan
meisters <jan_...@gmx.net>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Mai 2022 16:07
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference
Hi Gerd,
here OFM lite gives the same unwanted result as OFM full :-(
Jan
> Am 29.05.2022 um 14:54 schrieb Gerd Petermann
> <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>:
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> the artifical way would be a highway=residential, not path. Anyhow, I tried
> to reproduce the different routing results with the mentioned change in the
> OFM lite style
> but found no difference, the wanted route is calculated for both versions.
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd
> Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Mai 2022 14:10
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> not sure if you would find it with that id, since it would be an artificial
> way. Don't have time now, will look into this later.
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von jan
> meisters <jan_...@gmx.net>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Mai 2022 14:07
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> do you mean another routable line?
> All (routable) highways are echotagged in my style atm, but I can´t find
> 27463238 twice.
>
> Jan
>
>
>> Am 29.05.2022 um 09:16 schrieb Gerd Petermann
>> <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> might be the oneway:bicycle=no on way 27463238 which can create an
>> additional path in the opposite direction.
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von jan
>> meisters <jan_...@gmx.net>
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Mai 2022 20:15
>> An: Development list for mkgmap
>> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I´m using an altered copy of the OFM style and therefore sometimes compare
>> the results.
>> One routing difference I found I was able to lead back, but the cause I
>> don´t understand at all.
>>
>> My test-route should prefer the small residential „Altengabengäßchen“ over
>> the primary „Viktoriastrasse“.
>> Latest OFM does, my version not since I removed {add bicycle=yes} from this
>> line:
>> highway=path & surface ~
>> '(paved|asphalt|sett|concrete|paving_stones|paving_stones:30)' & access!=no
>> & access!=private & vehicle!=no { set highway=pedestrian; add bicycle=yes;
>> add motorcar=yes; }
>>
>> But unfortunately there is no path or pedestrian in the test-route, nor is
>> it an option to use one.
>> Anyone has an idea how this path>pedestrian rule could affect routing on
>> residential/primary?
>> Same happens when I replay the change with the original OFM.
>>
>> Up-to-date osm.pbf, route from BC and screenshots are here:
>> https://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/556/test_route.zip
>>
>> Thanks
>> Jan
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
