Hi Gerd, I just played with the routing prefs to see if I could change something ;-)
I´m using it like this: https://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/557/OFM_default-BC_Mac.png <https://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/557/OFM_default-BC_Mac.png> And same here, checked toll-avoidance routes as preferred, unchecked over the primary. Toll-avoidance should prefer bicycleroutes according to Minko. I´ve unchecked long ago for some reason, don´t remember why and have to recompare. But same as no path is routed there is no bicycleroute … Jan > Am 29.05.2022 um 16:17 schrieb Gerd Petermann > <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>: > > Hi jan, > > maybe my routing profile for OFM bike is different? > > Not sure what Minko recommends today. Mine says "Faster Time", Standard > Elevation Mode, only road type avoidance is for "Roll Roads". > When I remove the toll roads avoidance the route is different and follows the > major road. > > Gerd > > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von jan > meisters <jan_...@gmx.net> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Mai 2022 16:07 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference > > Hi Gerd, > > here OFM lite gives the same unwanted result as OFM full :-( > > Jan > >> Am 29.05.2022 um 14:54 schrieb Gerd Petermann >> <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>: >> >> Hi Jan, >> >> the artifical way would be a highway=residential, not path. Anyhow, I tried >> to reproduce the different routing results with the mentioned change in the >> OFM lite style >> but found no difference, the wanted route is calculated for both versions. >> >> Gerd >> >> ________________________________________ >> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd >> Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Mai 2022 14:10 >> An: Development list for mkgmap >> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference >> >> Hi Jan, >> >> not sure if you would find it with that id, since it would be an artificial >> way. Don't have time now, will look into this later. >> >> Gerd >> >> ________________________________________ >> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von jan >> meisters <jan_...@gmx.net> >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Mai 2022 14:07 >> An: Development list for mkgmap >> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference >> >> Hi Gerd, >> >> do you mean another routable line? >> All (routable) highways are echotagged in my style atm, but I can´t find >> 27463238 twice. >> >> Jan >> >> >>> Am 29.05.2022 um 09:16 schrieb Gerd Petermann >>> <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>: >>> >>> Hi Jan, >>> >>> might be the oneway:bicycle=no on way 27463238 which can create an >>> additional path in the opposite direction. >>> >>> Gerd >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von jan >>> meisters <jan_...@gmx.net> >>> Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Mai 2022 20:15 >>> An: Development list for mkgmap >>> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Question on routing difference >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I´m using an altered copy of the OFM style and therefore sometimes compare >>> the results. >>> One routing difference I found I was able to lead back, but the cause I >>> don´t understand at all. >>> >>> My test-route should prefer the small residential „Altengabengäßchen“ over >>> the primary „Viktoriastrasse“. >>> Latest OFM does, my version not since I removed {add bicycle=yes} from this >>> line: >>> highway=path & surface ~ >>> '(paved|asphalt|sett|concrete|paving_stones|paving_stones:30)' & access!=no >>> & access!=private & vehicle!=no { set highway=pedestrian; add bicycle=yes; >>> add motorcar=yes; } >>> >>> But unfortunately there is no path or pedestrian in the test-route, nor is >>> it an option to use one. >>> Anyone has an idea how this path>pedestrian rule could affect routing on >>> residential/primary? >>> Same happens when I replay the change with the original OFM. >>> >>> Up-to-date osm.pbf, route from BC and screenshots are here: >>> https://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/556/test_route.zip >>> >>> Thanks >>> Jan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list >>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk >>> https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
