ye, it's also fact that the site hasn't been updated in 3 years now..
meh... On 23 February 2010 11:25, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti <[email protected]>wrote: > This has to be pushed from above. ISPs will never upgrade all their routers > out of will unless it makes financial sense to them. Only new ISPs who buy > new equipment would actually offer support. > The following people might have a better clue: > http://www.mt.ipv6tf.org/aboutus/ > > Last I asked I published my findings over here. I honestly don't consider > it worth it to use tunnelling services since it reminds me of the good old > days of dialup (including the latency). > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ah fudgits...it's the same method of management we always work with here >> in malta..Instead of being aware of the global problem with ipv4 addresses >> and taking steps to be the first in teh market to implement ipv6 and bring >> new functionality to the client, we wait and lurk in the shadows until the >> problem becomes so real that not facing it would result in people not having >> internet connectivity. >> >> Ofcourse this will bring with it the usual problems of a hurried >> migration, no proper plan, missing features and lacking services of which in >> the end it's us as customers that will be facing the consequences. >> >> And when then finally they do start moving to ipv6, none of their >> subscribers will have ipv6 enabled routers that actually support the stack >> well resulting in even more inconvenience. >> >> Early dual stack adoption would help avoid all this but hey im not more >> than a snotty customer that doesn't know anything 'bout natworkssss hijj! >> >> ax hekk qalli tal go lahhar darba li cempilt :| >> >> >> On 23 February 2010 11:08, Iain <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I wonder if Glen considers a year to be "the near future"? >>> >>> I'm seriously questioning whether any ISP has actually done something to >>> implement IPv6 locally. An email I received from GO towards the end of >>> last year said that they "do not have any time frame when the system >>> will be upgraded to IPv6" and that "all the network's infastructure >>> [sic] needs to be changed". >>> >>> Hoping for some positive results from another angle, but for the time >>> being, using a tunnel broker seems to be the only solution. >>> >>> Smart Island, my arse. >>> >>> On 08/03/09 23:04, Anton Xuereb wrote: >>> > Dear client, >>> > >>> > regarding IPv6 deployment, the company is in process to implement >>> > IPv6 in the future but due to the complexity of the isue we are unable >>> > to provide you with an exact date then this will be finalised. We will >>> > however, in the near future, advise our clients when IPv6 is to be >>> > deployed and the steps to be taken to implement it from there end. >>> > Should you need further information please do not hesitate to contact >>> us >>> > back. >>> > >>> > Thanks and best regards, >>> > >>> > Glen Taylor >>> > >>> > GO Technical Support Agent. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti >>> > <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Bil-Malti nghidu laqi - but yes lets hear what they have to say. >>> > Vodafone anyone ? >>> > >>> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Anton Xuereb >>> > <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > > I finally got round to emailing some isps.. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > GO >>> > > ______________________________________________________________ >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > I would like to enquire on the state of IPv6 deployment or any >>> > plans to do >>> > > so. >>> > > >>> > > As per EU directives, 25% of european households should be IPv6 >>> > enabled by >>> > > 2010 and there is no better way for GO to retain it's dominant >>> > position in >>> > > the Maltese market than by being at the front of the next >>> generation of >>> > > internet services. >>> > > >>> > > Hope to hear from you soon. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > >>> > > Anton Xuereb >>> > > >>> > > ______________________________________________________________ >>> > > >>> > > Melita >>> > > >>> > > ______________________________________________________________ >>> > > >>> > > Message : >>> > > >>> > > HI, >>> > > >>> > > I would like to enquire on that state of IPv6 support for melita >>> > customers. >>> > > As per EU directives 25% of european households should be IPv6 >>> > enabled by >>> > > 2010. Being at the front of the IPv6 revolution in Malta would >>> > ensure that >>> > > Melita remains the main telecommunications provider in Malta. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Anton Xuereb >>> > > >>> > > P.S. Yes I know, I'm a lying bastard - sue me Nothing like >>> > telling them >>> > > what they wanna hear :D >>> > > >>> > > M >>> > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Keith Vassallo >>> > <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> To me that sounds like they are not doing anything, otherwise >>> they >>> > >> would say so. >>> > >> >>> > >> K >>> > >> >>> > >> On Mar 2, 2009, at 14:10, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti >>> > <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >> > wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> > I forgot to mention, but it would be best to liase with the >>> people >>> > >> > representing the ISPs on the IPv6 task force. >>> > >> > >>> > >> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Iain >>> > <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >> >> Last week I sent messages to GO, Vodafone, Melita and Austin >>> Gatt >>> > >> >> asking >>> > >> >> about the status of IPv6 support. >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> So far I have one reply from GO: >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> "Unfortunately we are not in a position to respond to the >>> question >>> > >> >> below. It is currently an internal information which at the >>> > moment we >>> > >> >> cannot give out, but will be informing our customers in the >>> > upcoming >>> > >> >> future." >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> Great. Will not even say *if* they're doing anything about >>> it! >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> Iain. >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> Nothing back from any of the others. >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> On 25/02/09 10:08, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti wrote: >>> > >> >>> None... I have already sent an email to all of them as well >>> as >>> > >> >>> nudging >>> > >> >>> them to provide PoP access via SIXXS since they would >>> probably >>> > >> >>> need to >>> > >> >>> change their ADSL/cable modems. I suggest you send another >>> gentle >>> > >> >>> email. The more people ask, the more they consider buying >>> the >>> > >> >>> bandwidth. The only entity which apparently has official >>> > native IPv6 >>> > >> >>> connectivity is University through the EU academic network. >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> If anyone on the list can shed more light about this issue, >>> I >>> > >> >>> would be >>> > >> >>> deeply thankful. >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> I have setup my home router (Linux of course) with IPv6 >>> > connectivity >>> > >> >>> through a tunnel to holland. The italian PoP which was the >>> closest >>> > >> >>> wasn't providing access to non-customers when I registered. >>> I was >>> > >> >>> given a /48 and all my home has native IPv6 connectivity. >>> Would be >>> > >> >>> great to eliminate the need to tunnel since it kills latency >>> > when I >>> > >> >>> connect remotely to a file share or download ISOs via >>> bittorrent. >>> > >> >>> SIXXS offer a very good bittorrent service for people >>> connected >>> > >> >>> natively via IPv6. >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Iain >>> > <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >> >>>> Anyone know of an ISP in Malta who supports IPv6? >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> Regs. >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> Iain. >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> > >> >>>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> > >> >>>> [email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >> >>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >> >> MLUG-list mailing list >>> > >> >> [email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> > >> >> >>> > >> > _______________________________________________ >>> > >> > MLUG-list mailing list >>> > >> > [email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >> MLUG-list mailing list >>> > >> [email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > MLUG-list mailing list >>> > > [email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> > > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > MLUG-list mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]> >>> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > MLUG-list mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > MLUG-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list > >
_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list [email protected] http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
