Yes I agree. What provider do you currently use ? On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Iain <[email protected]> wrote:
> > However, my experience with ipv6.google.com <http://ipv6.google.com> is > > not all that great using this compared to standard IPv4 not due to > > Google themselves but because of the added overhead of routing through a > > PoP. > > All traffic will be routed through a POP. Multiple POPs, actually. It > would be impossible for anyone to differentiate between being routed > through a dozen POPs and a single slow one, just watching the screen. > You can have local latency that gives you an RTT through the roof, > routing through different POP sites will often be done at layer 2, so > you'll not even see a hop. > > Trust me on this. > > > What provider do you use? I am using GO as my local ISP. > > Likewise, GO. No complaints so far. Except the lack of native IPv6. > > Have emailed the European Commission now to ask about how they rate > their success on the 2008 Action Plan. > > _______________________________________________ > MLUG-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >
_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list [email protected] http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
