Yes, thats how I have it setup here too. However, my experience with ipv6.google.com is not all that great using this compared to standard IPv4 not due to Google themselves but because of the added overhead of routing through a PoP.
What provider do you use? I am using GO as my local ISP. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Iain <[email protected]> wrote: > > Last I asked I published my findings over here. I honestly don't > > consider it worth it to use tunnelling services since it reminds me of > > the good old days of dialup (including the latency). > > If you establish the tunnel from your border device, it's transparent to > end user stations. > > As for latency, I get significantly lower RTTs to ipv6.google.com than > to www.google.com. > > _______________________________________________ > MLUG-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >
_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list [email protected] http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
