> However, my experience with ipv6.google.com <http://ipv6.google.com> is
> not all that great using this compared to standard IPv4 not due to
> Google themselves but because of the added overhead of routing through a
> PoP.

All traffic will be routed through a POP. Multiple POPs, actually. It
would be impossible for anyone to differentiate between being routed
through a dozen POPs and a single slow one, just watching the screen.
You can have local latency that gives you an RTT through the roof,
routing through different POP sites will often be done at layer 2, so
you'll not even see a hop.

Trust me on this.

> What provider do you use? I am using GO as my local ISP.

Likewise, GO. No complaints so far. Except the lack of native IPv6.

Have emailed the European Commission now to ask about how they rate
their success on the 2008 Action Plan.

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to