>
> This is why the automatic description cache and the manual description
> need to be kept separate; just "pasting" the autodesc into the manual
> description field would mean it could never be updated automatically. That
> would be very bad indeed.


+1000!!!! Exactly! I was operating under the assumption we were talking
about the existing "description" field. Separate auto and manual
description fields completely avoids *all* of the issues/concerns I raised
:)

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

> So it turns out that ValterVBot alone has created over 1.8 MILLION
> "manual" descriptions. And there are other bots that do this. We already
> HAVE automatic descriptions, we just store them in the "manual" field.
>
> The worst of both worlds.
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:24 AM Magnus Manske <magnusman...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:43 AM Monte Hurd <mh...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>>> True about algorithms never being finished, but aren't we essentially
>>> "stuck" with the first run output, unless I misunderstand how you envision
>>> this working?
>>>
>>> (assuming you don't want to over-write non-blank descriptions the next
>>> time you improve and re-run the process)
>>>
>>
>> Of course we're not "stuck" with the initial automatic descriptions!
>> Whatever gave you that idea? Ideally, each description would be computed
>> on-the-fly, but that won't scale; output needs to be cached, and
>> invalidated when necessary.
>>
>> Possible reasons for cache invalidation:
>> * The item statements have changed
>> * Items referenced in the description (e.g. country for nationality) have
>> changed
>> * The algorithm has been improved
>> * After cache reached a certain age, just to make sure
>>
>> This is why the automatic description cache and the manual description
>> need to be kept separate; just "pasting" the autodesc into the manual
>> description field would mean it could never be updated automatically. That
>> would be very bad indeed.
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Mobile-l mailing list
Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l

Reply via email to