If you are considering writing subclasses that do similar things to CGI.pm,
you might consider looking at CGI.pm 3.0 as the various features (eg HTML
generation) are more broken out... And then the two would run more parallel
to each other.
At 03:30 PM 5/17/00 +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
>Drew Taylor and I are about to write a subclass of Apache::Request which
>includes form element generation methods, a la CGI.pm. The current favourite
>name is Apache::Request::Forms, but we'd like to know if anyone has a better
>one.
>
>The module is currently planned to be fairly bare-boned, only adding form
>element generation methods for methods which will benefit from CGI.pm-style
>sticky values, and the parameters these methods take are likely to be a lot
>more restricted than CGI.pm's (not difficult, really). However, this could
>change in the unlikely event that we get deluged with feature requests.
>
>--
> Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>"We're sorry. The brain you have mailed has been disconnected or is no longer
> in service. Please re-check the address and send your message again.
> If you feel you have reached this recording in error, JUST STOP CREATING
> EVIL
> PUNCTUATION OPERATORS, SO CHIP'S BRAIN WILL STOP EXPLODING. Thank you."
> -- Chip Salzenberg
