On Wed, 17 May 2000, Vivek Khera wrote: > I think the name CGI::Form is appropriate, since the > forms are part of the CGI protocol, not anything > mod_perl or Apache sepecific. CGI::Form seems to be an > abandoned module, so I'm sure you can get permission to > adopt it and extend it. actually forms are specified in HTML, not CGI. peter: i question why you want to subclass Apache::Request, rather than provide a helper class that maybe maintains a reference to an Apache::Request object, or some other weaker type of relationship. consider writing your forms library to depend on an interface, not a specific class, so that users can provide either a CGI object or an Apache::Request object. perhaps the only interface you need is $obj->param?
- RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something similar) Peter Haworth
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something simil... Autarch
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something s... Peter Haworth
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something s... Drew Taylor
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or somethi... Autarch
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or somethi... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something simil... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something simil... Vivek Khera
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or something s... brian moseley
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or somethi... Drew Taylor
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or som... brian moseley
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (o... Drew Taylor
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or somethi... Vivek Khera
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or somethi... Peter Haworth
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (or som... brian moseley
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Forms (o... Peter Haworth
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Form... Matt Sergeant
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Form... Drew Taylor
- Re: RFC: Apache::Request::Form... Vivek Khera