Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
>
> However, you can't claim that mod_perl _is_ perl and at the same time
> claim that perfectly valid perl code is broken. Either it's broken code
> in the mod_perl dialect or it's valid code not working due to environment
> constraints.
>
this is definetly perl. it is your standard perl interpreter that is being used.
unless you are doing something tricky, it is the same perl that is running all of
your other perl programs. these "gotchas" are there in regular perl and people
get bitten by them outside of mod_perl. mod_perl does nothing that changes
regular perl.
by the way - you have one of the coolest signatures i've seen!
--
___cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> -----==- |
> ----==-- _ |
> ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
> --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
> -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
> The choice of a GNU generation |
> |
