On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Vivek Khera wrote: > <head> > <title>My Site</title> > </head> > <body> > <tr> > <td>[% stick in body of article here "document.main" %]</td> > <td>[% stick in related info here "document.sidebar" if it exists %]</td> > </tr> > </body> > > That is, I have exactly one template that I apply to each document. > Right now I do that using Sandwich and some pre-processing, but I'd > much rather let a real template system do it so I can put parts in > various places. > > Is TT the something that will let me do this without too much > headache? I'm sure TT can do this. In addition, pretty much all the templating systems probably accomodate this. Under Mason this could be done very easily using the autohandler facility it provides. -dave /*================== www.urth.org We await the New Sun ==================*/
- dynamic vs. mostly static data Neil Conway
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Vivek Khera
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Matt Sergeant
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Greg Cope
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Ken Y. Clark
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Andy Wardley
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Vivek Khera
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Dave Rolsky
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static da... Gerald Richter
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data David Hodgkinson
- RE: dynamic vs. mostly static data Jason Liu
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Marinos J. Yannikos
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Perrin Harkins
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Marinos J. Yannikos
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static data Perrin Harkins
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly static da... Marinos J. Yannikos
- Re: dynamic vs. mostly stati... Perrin Harkins