On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
Hi,
> > Please explain, the guide appears to recommend -w as a useful
> > diagnostic technique (and the "Command Line Switches (-w, -T,
> > etc)" section says -w works).
> The guide is correct. -w in the shebang line is equal to 'local $^W=1' for
> the file scope. and it does have an effect (for the file it's defined in).
Stas is right, I mixed up -w and -T :-(((
Sorry for bothering you guys...
Bye,
remco
/----------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Remco Schaar |
| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
South Park meets Linux:
- "Oh my God, they killed init!"
- "You bastards!"
- Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict ed phillips
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict remco
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict G.W. Haywood
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Paul DuBois
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Stas Bekman
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Simon_Wilcox
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Simon_Wilcox
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict lporcano
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
- Re: Apache::Registry() and strict lporcano
- RE: Apache::Registry() and strict Geoffrey Young
- RE: Apache::Registry() and strict Ron Rademaker
