Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl with scripts that contain un-shared memory

[Vivek Khera]

>>>>> "KW" == Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

KW> Well then, why doesn't somebody just make an Apache directive to
KW> control how hits are divvied out to the children?  Something like

According to memory, mod_perl 2.0 uses a most-recently-used strategy
to pull perl interpreters from the thread pool.  It sounds to me like
with apache 2.0 in thread-mode and mod_perl 2.0 you get the same
effect of using the proxy front end that we currently need.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/