Hi Geoff, On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote: > this does present the opportune time to ask the list about the future of > this digest... > unfortunately, there is no easy way to derive a decent plain text > version from an XML base... !!!??? That's just plain ridiculous. > thus, the move to take23.org may mean that the digest no longer appears on > the list in plaintext, but merely as a posting with a link to the current > version... > > how does this strike everyone? YUCK!!! 73, Ged.
- [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Geoffrey Young
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Antti Linno
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Chip Turner
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Steve Reppucci
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... G.W. Haywood
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... John BEPPU
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Andrew Ho
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Paul Johnson
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Stas Bekman
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Simon_Wilcox
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Robin Berjon