[ date ] 2001/01/30 | Tuesday | 01:50 PM
[ author ] G.W. Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > unfortunately, there is no easy way to derive a decent plain text
> > version from an XML base...
>
> !!!??? That's just plain ridiculous.
I agree. If there's going to be an HTML version of it somewhere
along the line, couldn't a plain text version be done by doing
something like:
w3m -dump -T text/html < whatever.html > plaintext
XML -> X?HTML -> plaintext
right? Am I missing something?
- [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Geoffrey Young
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Antti Linno
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Chip Turner
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Steve Reppucci
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... G.W. Haywood
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... John BEPPU
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Andrew Ho
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Paul Johnson
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Stas Bekman
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Simon_Wilcox
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Robin Berjon
- Re: [RFC] mod_perl Digest path... Matt Sergeant
