> We use ePerl for a fair number of things, and I have yet to run into
> something we needed of which it was not capable. What are you
> thinking of?
It's not a question of it not being capable, it's just that most people seem
to choose one of the more full-featured tools. There's lots of talk on the
list about Apache::ASP, Embperl, Mason, etc., but not much about ePerl.
(Maybe I should do some research in the mail archives and graph the results.
Sounds like a magazine column...) Also, I think Text::Template stole some
users away from ePerl.
Like SSI, ePerl is perfect for some people who just want a simple solution
that stays out of their way.
Also, I believe that security issue Ged referred to was fixed by the author.
- Perrin
