Similarly, this concept of Enterprise is a bugus idea ... from a pure
computer science point of view, there is no such thing as an Enterprise.
This is all Microsoft's branding trying to associate themselves with
something big, and Sun is stupidly following it....
My vote is to come up with something more pure than trendy like
Enterprise.
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Joe Brenner wrote:
>
> > At 02:28 PM 10/23/2001 -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > >Stephen Adkins wrote:
>
> > >> If no one suggests an appropriate list, I propose starting a "p2ee" group
>
> > >Can I just say that P2EE is a horrible, horrible name? It includes the
> > >Java version number (when is J3EE coming out?), as well as Sun's
> > >desperate attempt to make it sound like something you buy ("Edition")
> > >rather than simply a collection of APIs.
> > >
> > >Something simple, like Perl Enterprise Project or Perl Enterprise APIs
> > >makes more sense to me.
>
> > Several of you have made the same good point.
> > And now the naming flame war has already begun... ;-)
> >
> > Unless there is violent opposition, the name will be
> >
> > Perl Enterprise Framework
> >
> > I would rather name it after the outcome (Framework)
> > than the process (Project).
>
> PEP is a much better acronym though.
>
> No more Java beans: use PEP pills!
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Medi Montaseri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix Distributed Systems Engineer HTTP://www.CyberShell.com
CyberShell Engineering
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
