>This is a design flaw of DBI then. You might get more results if you >post on the DBI users list. We got part of the way there by >redefining the trace_msg function, the only part that remains is >gathering the output of the lower-level DBD calls, that might involve >modifying some XS code, (or it might not).. > >Propose a 'callback' interface on dbi-users, you'll probably get a >warm reception.
I agree. This always was a design flaw of DBI. I was only hoping that there would be another way around it. I took this to the creator of DBI long before posting here and never heard back. I will take it to dbi-users and see where I get. Thanks for all the help you gave. Mark
