> > Your patch seems to me to be partially wrong (you missed similar
> > addition a few lines above, while calculating the destination
> > size).
>
> Erm, yeah, so I see, now that you mention it.
And this patch version seem to be correct
(oh, maybe someone could consider also adding some test case to
t/net/perl/util.pl but it does not seem to be very important)
> > Nevertheless, I write here about the problem because I would really
> > like having such a change in the mainstream modperl distribution.
> > Keeping my own patched modperl distribution, integrating changes etc
> > is a bit troublesome (organizationally).
>
> I'm think that, with mod_perl 2.0, mod_perl 1.x might not be high on
> maintainer's list of stuff to do, but Jim Winstead would probably
> accept a (proper!) patch and release libapreq-1.01.
Hmm, should I do something to send it to him or is he reading this
list?
Regards (and thanks)
Marcin
--
( Marcin Kasperski | Communication takes place between people, documents )
( http://www.mk.w.pl | are secondary. (Booch) )
(----------------------------------------------------------------------------)
( Dokument biznesowy w LaTeXu: http://www.mk.w.pl/porady/latex/mkofficial_cls)
