> Rafael Garcia-Suarez suggested to: > > - SV *sv = SvROK(ST(i)) && (SvTYPE(SvRV(ST(i))) == SVt_PV); > + SV *sv = SvROK(ST(i)) && (SvTYPE(SvRV(ST(i))) >= SVt_PV); > > Jonathan, have you verified that it fixes your problem?
Yes. I just tried this change with Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) mod_perl/1.27 mod_ssl/2.8.12 OpenSSL/0.9.6g and it worked like a charm. > Geoffry Young said: > > it just sounds like an awful lot of stuff to me to be adding where we > weren't before (11 more PV variants, according to the crack-pipe book), > which drastically increases our exposure to unknown behaviors. That is true... but I remember the following at some point early on in the discussion: > Rafael Garcia-Suarez said: > > That's a common idiom in the perl core -- hence my "at first sight". > A couple of bugs were fixed like this. I am not able to verify that, but if it is a common thing, perhaps it's the "right" way to detect a perl scalar reference from the other side? Not that I understand anything about the other side anyways :) Cheers, Jonathan Field -- Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
