>>>Actually, I can't think of a good reason why checking for 'module.so' and not >>>'module.c' would make sense. >> >> >>Hmm, may be someone will want to know that it was loaded as DSO. > > > Yeah, I can't think really why, but that's what .so would be for.
really? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=98820866200003&r=1&w=2 ;) --Geoff -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
