> I wouldn't either - however : I would preferre using Apache instead > of using IIS ;-) - and the company I currently have some contract with > want's to throw away the running apache/freebsd server because > "it's to complicate" and "unix is dead" ;-). Horrible! They go on like that at my job too. However, I got them to accept me setting up a FreeBSD box as our firewall. :) At least they admitted that you couldn't use a Windows-system to handle security. :-D ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl) www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/ Official Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port) Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port) Michael Lechner
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port... Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 ... Michael Lechner
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Wi... Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.... Michael Lechner
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-... Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Wi... Niklas Saers
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.... Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-... Niklas Saers
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port) Trung Tran-Duc
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port... Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port... Michael Lechner
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port) Trung Tran-Duc
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port) Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port) Hakan . Tandogan
- Re: ANNOUNCE: mod_ssl 2.1b5-1.3.2 (Win32 port... Ralf S. Engelschall
- DLL or not DLL ??? Michael Lechner
