FYI. We had to choose to test that by using other versions and we found that the problem is resolved if we downgrade to 2.0.50.
Ken On 4/22/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI. > > I have tried to test upload with Firefox. But it turns out that it > fails too. Then, it might not be only a MSIE issue. > > > > On 4/22/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > My colleague has helped to deploy the patch and the ssl vhost has been > > configured as follow: > > <VirtualHost test:443> > > DocumentRoot "/home/server/webpage" > > ServerName 192.168.2.130:443 > > LogLevel debug > > ErrorLog logs/ssl-error_log > > CustomLog logs/ssl-access_log common > > > > BrowserMatch ".*MSIE.*" \ > > nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown \ > > downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 > > > > ProxyPass /eservices http://localhost:8855/eservices > > ProxyPassReverse /eservices http://localhost:8855/eservices > > > > Alias /eservices-webpage/ /home/server/webpage/ > > > > SSLEngine on > > SSLCipherSuite > > ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL > > SSLCertificateFile someCrt.crt > > SSLCertificateKeyFile someKey.key > > </VirtualHost> > > > > But seems the problem remains: Page can't be displayed. I found no > > error in log (maybe I was not able to found). Here attached the log > > when I press upload to upload file. > > > > > > Ken > > > > > > On 4/21/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Joe, > > > > > > Do you mind telling me how to apply the patch? Type command as follow? > > > patch -s < xxxx.patch > > > > > > Do I need to stop the httpd server? or recompile or anything else? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > On 4/21/06, Ken Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ic. Thanks so much. I will apply that patch and see what is going on > > > > later. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/21/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 03:19:35PM +0800, Ken Chen wrote: > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > > > > > > > We are using 2.0.55 already. Is it already include that patch? > > > > > > > > > > No, it will be in 2.0.56 and later. But note this only applies if you > > > > > are using a reverse proxy, and it only affects the application of the > > > > > BrowserMatch statement - if you don't have the BrowserMatch, it has no > > > > > effect. > > > > > > > > > > joe > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > > > > > User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org > > > > > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > Ken Chen > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > Ken Chen > > > > > > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Ken Chen > > > > > > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------- > Ken Chen > -- -------------------------------------------------- Ken Chen ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List modssl-users@modssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
