On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
> Does the application have a name?
We're just calling it the Mason Tracker.
> You could call it HTML::Mason::Tracker or something along those lines if
> it's part of Mason. Or you could do it like the Mon dist and use the name
> of the application for the namespace http://search.cpan.org/search?dist=Mon
> or you could pick a namespace that exists already that it might fit into
> and go from there.
Its definitely not part of Mason. Simply an app that uses Mason.
Last time I proposed a namespace that was simply the name of my app
(Alzabo::) one of the people on the modules list objected.
> http://www.cpan.org/modules/00modlist.long.html#ID5_NamespaceCo
> is a good reference and browsing the list of catgories and namespaces my
> be helpful.
I'm familiar with the guidelines. If there's no objections I think we're
going to use Apps::Tracker. That way other apps can share that top level
namespace (Apps::*) and not worry about stepping on other modules.
We could, alternatively, use Tracker. I like that cause its less typing.
-dave
/*==================
www.urth.org
We await the New Sun
==================*/
