Re: Namespace for an application?

[François Désarménien]

Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:38:15 -0500
Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> > We could, alternatively, use Tracker.  I like that cause its less typing.
> 
> I prefer Apps::Tracker for being more descriptive. 
> 

So do I.

I think it's agood idea not to fragment too much the root namespace, and Apps
(or App) is generic enough for other applicative contributions.

But I definitly don't find it any descriptive : "traker" is too generic IMHO.

François