"Iain 'Spoon' Truskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Or see http://module-build.sf.net/META-spec.html
Isn't it rather premature to start asking everyone to provide META.yaml files while the file format and contents are still under development? For example, what distribution type should a distribution use that contains modules and scripts? There are still discussions going on on how to treat private modules, and so on. Particulary interesting is the remark that the file should start with 'a valid YAML document header, like "---- YAML:1.0"'. I would have expected something more definite. We're not talking some generic YAML data, this is META.yaml. -- Johan
