* Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-31 18:57]: > Moreover, this isn't quite the traditional decorator pattern, > which involves wrapping an _object_. Instead, this wraps > _classes_. Maybe something like Class::DecoratorClass or > Class::Decorate would be good?
I'd prefer Class::ClassDecorator. The fact it's in Class:: merely denotes its having to do with OO. That you decorate classes is a fact that needs pointing out separately. DecoratorClass seems wrong because the module isn't a decorator class - it is used to write decorate classes. -- Regards, Aristotle "If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
