On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-31 18:57]: > > Moreover, this isn't quite the traditional decorator pattern, > > which involves wrapping an _object_. Instead, this wraps > > _classes_. Maybe something like Class::DecoratorClass or > > Class::Decorate would be good? > > I'd prefer Class::ClassDecorator.
Ooh, I like it! > The fact it's in Class:: merely denotes its having to do with OO. > That you decorate classes is a fact that needs pointing out > separately. DecoratorClass seems wrong because the module isn't > a decorator class - it is used to write decorate classes. I agree. -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
