On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 10:08, Ken Williams wrote: > IMO if people are doing any sort of collaboration, you really should > set up a centralized source that they can submit patches against, and > keep up-to-the-minute track of what you're doing (like right after you > send an email about something you're adding).
Of course. But I wasn't proposing using CPAN as a revision control system. I just have a number of people, on different lists (or none), that have expressed interest. I'm _hoping_ some become collaborators and offer to help out, in which case I will set something up. Or at least to provide constructive feedback about interface,, structure, etc. But at the moment this is a very new project and I was looking for an easy way to make the latest dev versions available quickly for people to download and examine. > It's easy enough to set > up a sourceforge account for CVS. Easier than installing your own I suppose. > It's always a pain to submit patches against things when they don't > make their revision control system accessible. LOL! True, but I don't think CPAN ever pretended to be a revision control system. ... That being said, someday having one available tied to CPAN could be very cool under these types of circumstances. -- Sean Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
