On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:03:09PM +0000, Robert Rothenberg wrote: > > I'm sympathetic to the idea, but some of the information in DSLIP is > useful and shouldn't be thrown away (such as how supported, > alpha/beta/mature, and license). What isn't in META.yml should go there.
I'm much less interested in whether the author thinks the work is mature, than what the users thinks. We already have a mechanism to create version numbers that indicate a developer release. For me, having a development/stable indicator than an alpha/beta/mature label. How many times have you found a module with a version less than '0.10' that was actually stable mature? On the other hand, sometimes 'mature' modules get overhauled, abandoned or forked and aren't really 'stable'. Mark -- http://mark.stosberg.com/