On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 10:40 -0400, David Golden wrote: > Is this Perl-specific?
Let's say 'yes'. I don't intend to set arbitrary limits but my orientation is to Perl. > Most perl developer tools seem to be winding > up under Module::* or Dist::* Thanks for the concrete suggestions. I tend to see modules in those namespaces as more wrap-up-and-kick-out-the-door tools, rather than ongoing development aids. But that's a quibble; I don't think either is a bad fit. I had thought seriously of 'File::', since it deals largely with whole-file movement. > I agree with Ricardo... I don't see his comment, either in email or in the perl.module-authors newsgroup. Would you be kind enough to repost it? > ... "Hump" has some negative meanings... {sigh} I'd like to hope that engineers are able to say 'screw' without inciting "Huh-huh-huh, he said 'screw'". I may be wrong. 'Hump' may not be particularly descriptive. I particularly like it because it's short and easy to type. Other thoughts: ::Tug ::Porter ::Ranger ::Valet -- -Xiong