On reflection, I'd like to go further and say I like 'Module::Ranger' particularly. Although the scope of action may go a bit further than a Perl module, 'Module::' is consistent with related module development tools; while '::Ranger' encompasses the concepts of management, impartial service, forestry (tree maintenance), and, well, a broad range of action.
I would *very* much like to get to work on this. Please say if there's an obvious reason why this name choice is bad or, if you think so, good. -- -Xiong
