The savings for going to .bz2 over .gz for source code are fairly insignificant. We're talking about source code for a perl module. Is your stuff tens of megabytes in size? That's a lot of code if so. I could understand if you were distributing a sizable database with your code but source code, even 100KLOC? Once you go to .gz you're already at better than 2:1. What are you going to save by going to even 3:1, 10Kbytes? compared to the nuisance inflicted, it's nothing.
- Using a better compression than .gz for one's CPAN modules Shlomi Fish
- Re: Using a better compression than .gz for one's CPAN... David Golden
- Re: Using a better compression than .gz for one's ... dhudes
- Re: Using a better compression than .gz for on... Daniel Staal
- Re: Using a better compression than .gz fo... dhudes
- Re: Using a better compression than .... Curtis Jewell
- Re: Using a better compression than .... Daniel Staal
- Reducing rsync cost (was: Re: Using a... David Landgren
- Re: Reducing rsync cost (was: Re:... David Nicol
- Re: Reducing rsync cost David Landgren
- Re: Reducing rsync cost Nicholas Clark
- Re: Reducing rsync cost David Golden
- Re: Reducing rsync cost David Precious