# from Andreas J. Koenig
# on Tuesday 12 June 2007 09:51 pm:
>The example code in the META-spec.pod erroneously says
>build_requires
fixed in r9645
> > I haven't figured out the right thing to do vis-a-vis
> automatically > adding M::B to config_requires.
>
>My current thinking about is that it would be too redundant to add MB
>itself to config_requires because the fact that a Build.PL exists
>currently always means that Module::Build is needed.
We need CPAN(PLUS) to be able to upgrade Module::Build *before* running
Build.PL. Thus, I don't think it is redundant. This would also be the
place to specify required M::B plugins/mixins.
--Eric
--
The only thing that could save UNIX at this late date would be a new $30
shareware version that runs on an unexpanded Commodore 64.
--Don Lancaster (1991)
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
