Graham Barr writes: > Do we really need this sent out for every Email ? > > On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0300, CPAN FAQbot wrote: > > Hi, this is a recorded message. > > > > At the tone of <BEEP> you may read from > > > > http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html > > > > the answers to the most common questions asked from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess not. But why this is happening? Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] a recipient of every modules list message? What currently triggers this message is the following procmail rule: :0 * ^TOcpan@perl * !^X-CPAN-FAQbot: reply -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Chris Nandor
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Kurt D. Starsinic