On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 02:54:48PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > Graham Barr writes: > > Do we really need this sent out for every Email ? > > > > On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0300, CPAN FAQbot wrote: > > > Hi, this is a recorded message. > > > > > > At the tone of <BEEP> you may read from > > > > > > http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html > > > > > > the answers to the most common questions asked from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I guess not. > > But why this is happening? Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] a recipient of every > modules list message? I guess so. > What currently triggers this message is the > following procmail rule: > > :0 > * ^TOcpan@perl > * !^X-CPAN-FAQbot: reply Well my replys won't have the X-CPAN-FAQbot header Graham.
- Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors/id/ Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Chris Nandor
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: Reworking CPAN/authors... Graham Barr