Tim, I'd have thought 17 years wasn't bad for a pair of wings ? best Mike (normally SWS now Solihull)
________________________________ From: Tim Harris [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Fri 10/08/2012 20:22 To: mogtalk2 Subject: Re: [mogtalk2] Why? On 10 August 2012 18:41, Dave P <[email protected]> wrote: The answer is in dialectics:.when do improvements cease to improve a thing and instead, start to adulterate it with modernity?At what point should it be made illegal to further 'improve' a mog? 'Adulterate with modernity', I like that phrase :-) So here's a thing: when MMC built my Mog, they didn't bother to paint it properly, with the result that the wings rusted so badly they needed replacing after 17 years and 60k miles - including the inner wing valances. I got new wings from the factory, updating to stainless inner wings, and I made sure the wings were painted properly before assembly. Sensible improvement, or non-standard adulteration? Tim View posts on The Mail Archive http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> ------------------------------------------- View posts on The Mail Archive http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ [http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/] Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=22459785&id_secret=22459785-4a39ddf8 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
<<winmail.dat>>
