On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:02:39AM +0100, Thomas Keller wrote: > > monotone's code base ages in the meantime, and while it is still very, > very sophisticated in many areas, it might just scare away younger devs > because its C++, and not Ruby, or Python, or Java.
So sad. Not that they flee C++ for other languages, but sad for the other languages they flee to. When I fled C++ I went to Modula 3. It's really too bad the user community for Modula 3 is so small. My only complaint about it is its wordy syntax. Where it matters -- semantics, speed, reliability, and static checking -- it's just fine. No, I'm not suggesting rewriting monotone in Modula 3. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
