Excerpts from Chris Fields's message of Tue Sep 08 13:14:20 -0400 2009: > I think the suggestion is that type constraints be completely divorced > from Moose so that other possibly non-Moose/CMOP projects can use it w/ > o requiring Moose/CMOP. Or is that missing the mark John?
I understand the suggestion, and it is a reasonable one. Why would such a type constraint implementation be mutually exclusive with MooseX::Types going into core? Wouldn't we just reimplement Moose::Types in terms of this new independent code? hdp.
