Dexter,
Please do not use the MooseX:: namespace for this, it is reserved
specifically for extensions of Moose and we are trying to enforce that
more and more these days.
From what I see in your README it actually looks pretty nice. Can you
perhaps expand on what it provides over the existing ORMs like
DBIx::Class, Fey::ORM and Rose::DB::Object?
Thanks,
- Stevan
On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Dexter Tad-y wrote:
Greetings all,
I am releasing code for my attempt in writing a Moose-based ORM
extension, named MooseX::DataMapper for the mean time.
It started as a code exercise in metaclass programming, born out of
a few days offline vacation last week. Upon getting back online, I
found the recent sentiments Re: ORMs being discussed just a few
weeks back.
I do hope to get feedback from the community, especially if some
people find it useful and is worthy of future work.
Read more at GitHub:
http://github.com/dexterbt1/MooseX-DataMapper
Regards,
Dexter Tad-y
