Hi Stevan, Can you suggest an alternative namespace for this? I'll try to come up with another name for the project.
I have updated the README for the comparison of DM with DBIC and Fey::ORM. http://github.com/dexterbt1/MooseX-DataMapper Thanks! Regards, --- On Thu, 6/17/10, Stevan Little <stevan.lit...@iinteractive.com> wrote: From: Stevan Little <stevan.lit...@iinteractive.com> Subject: Re: A MooseX ORM, an attempt To: "Dexter Tad-y" <dexter...@yahoo.com> Cc: "moose ML" <moose@perl.org> Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 1:00 AM Dexter, Please do not use the MooseX:: namespace for this, it is reserved specifically for extensions of Moose and we are trying to enforce that more and more these days. >From what I see in your README it actually looks pretty nice. Can you perhaps >expand on what it provides over the existing ORMs like DBIx::Class, Fey::ORM >and Rose::DB::Object? Thanks, - Stevan On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Dexter Tad-y wrote: > Greetings all, > > I am releasing code for my attempt in writing a Moose-based ORM extension, > named MooseX::DataMapper for the mean time. > > It started as a code exercise in metaclass programming, born out of a few > days offline vacation last week. Upon getting back online, I found the recent > sentiments Re: ORMs being discussed just a few weeks back. > > I do hope to get feedback from the community, especially if some people find > it useful and is worthy of future work. > > Read more at GitHub: > > http://github.com/dexterbt1/MooseX-DataMapper > > Regards, > > Dexter Tad-y > > > >
