On Jun 16, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Dan Horne wrote:
On 17 June 2010 08:51, Chris Prather wrote:
On Jun 16, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Dexter Tad-y wrote:
Hi Stevan,
Can you suggest an alternative namespace for this? I'll try to
come up
with another name for the project.
What's wrong with just DataMapper?
-Chris
This raises something that I've been thinking about lately. When can
one use
a Top Level namespace? I've written a Moose-based app - not a module
- which
I think others might be interested in, but haven't submitted it to
CPAN
because it doesn't use the TopLevel::SubLevel convention. But
neither does
Catalyst or Dancer or Mojolicious or ..... etc.... What are the
conventions/rules around this?
Some people frown upon any top-level namespaces, most people don't
really care. Often times it comes down to the find-ability of a name.
Meaning if your module provides a class system similar to Perl 6 don't
call it something stupid that no one will ever find, like Moose.
- Stevan
