Or could it mean that more people bookmark MooTools pages rather than searching for them?
Michal. On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > It's more powerfully, true. It's more complicated, true. jQuery people are > mostly folks with zero JavaScript experience, and that's simply not our > target. We want to have at least intermediate developers on our side. > > The Slick-enabled version of MooTools wasn't given enough publicity since > it's still a beta – hopefully there's going to be PR after the release of a > stable 1.3. > > On 26 May 2010, at 07:55, jiggliemon wrote: > >> http://www.google.com/trends?q=jquery%2C+mootools >> >> How can Mootools stats be dropping? It's clearly a more powerful >> framework (or even just a framework). Wouldn't the Query heads get >> tired of the restrictions and redundancy, and jump ship for something >> more extensible? >> >> I get the merits of jQuery, I even use it every day. But on that >> token; I'd rather be using mootools. >> >> Do we need to get a PR agent? > >
