I am waiting, jejejejeje http://www.flickr.com/photos/oskarkrawczyk/3819490987/
http://www.screencast.com/users/oskarkrawczyk/folders/Jing/media/49591e4d-10c5-4b08-a9e9-8c17a2c1cf92 On 26 mayo, 16:52, Oskar Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > Soon...ish :-) > > ___ > > Oskar Krawczykhttp://nouincolor.com > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Steve Onnis <[email protected]> wrote: > > i think if there was a nice "pretty" site for mootools UI stuff it would > > take off a bit more > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Fábio M. Costa [mailto:[email protected]] > > *Sent:* Thursday, 27 May 2010 12:47 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [Moo] Re: Why is Mootools dwindling? Haven't they heard > > about Slick? > > > Good points Ryan. > > =D > > > -- > > Fábio Miranda Costa > > Solucione Sistemas > > Engenheiro de interfaces > > Twitter: fabiomiranda > >http://solucione.info > > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Ryan Florence <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> It's simple, I think. > > >> 1) MooTools doesn't market itself. jQuery does an excellent job of > >> marketing. Not sure where the devs found the time ... > > >> 2) MooTools audience is "intermediate to advanced javascript developers" > >> whereas jQuery is "designed to change the way that you write javascript." > >> The jQuery approach attracts designers and back-end developers who don't > >> want to learn javascript. But that's not to say they don't have a smart > >> group of users as well, I was totally impressed by many people I met when I > >> spoke at jQuery Conference. > > >> 3) Search volume != usage trends > > >>http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=google%20chrome%2Cinternet%2... > > >> We all know that graph doesn't represent usage. How many times do you > >> search "mootools" in google? I imagine the majority of searches like > >> "mootools" and "jquery" are performed non-programmer admins and marketing > >> folks who are looking up buzzwords they hear in meetings. > > >> On May 26, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Oskar Krawczyk wrote: > > >> I think Hartum is talking about the website not the code of the framework. > > >> And, I disagree, their website is ugly as f*ck. > > >> ___ > > >> Oskar Krawczyk > >>http://nouincolor.com > > >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Steve Onnis <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>> And how does jquery look prettier? Jquery is a framework but also has a > >>> lot > >>> of ui stuff prebuilt with it that's all > > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: hartum [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, 26 May 2010 11:54 PM > >>> To: MooTools Users > >>> Subject: [Moo] Re: Why is Mootools dwindling? Haven't they heard about > >>> Slick? > > >>> I agree with almost everything has been said here, but there is a > >>> point that nobody has mentioned, > >>> and is a matter of marketing. > > >>> Jquery page looks prettier. > > >>> With rounded corners, web 2.0 look, colours, etc.. > > >>> Mootools page is made by programmers, for programmers. > > >>> A simple trick, please help to designers for your webpage, and will be > >>> not only good but also it will seem. > > >>> Once Again, sorry if my english is strange. :-S
